Question about the value of open positions and the number of lots

[khalids222]

Example: I opened a random buy position at a price = 300 lot =1
Then for every ten point drop in the price, I want to open a new deal with a larger lot in the ranking order , 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 etc
Let's go back to the example
price = 300 lot =1
price =290 lot =2
price = 280 lot = 3
price=270 lot= 4
price = 260 lot =5
All this is very easy, the question here or the required:
In every trade, I want Multiplied by the lot by the price and combine it with the previous one
back to the example i want :
price = 300 lot =1 300 1= 300
price =290 lot =2 300+(2902) /3
price = 280 lot = 3 300+ (2902)+(2803)/6
price=270 lot= 4 300 + (2902)+(2803)+ (270*4)/10
Divided by /total lot very trade

[khalids222]

Example: I opened a random buy position at a price = 300 lot =1
Then for every ten point drop in the price, I want to open a new deal with a larger lot in the ranking order , 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 etc
Let's go back to the example
price = 300 lot =1
price =290 lot =2
price = 280 lot = 3
price=270 lot= 4
price = 260 lot =5
All this is very easy, the question here or the required:
In every trade, I want Multiplied by the lot by the price and combine it with the previous one
back to the example i want :
price = 300 lot =1 300 x1= 300
price =290 lot =2 300+(290x2) /3
price = 280 lot = 3 300+ (290x2)+(280x3)/6
price=270 lot= 4 300 + (290x2)+(280x3)+ (270x4)/10
Divided by /total lot very trade

[l'andorrà]

@khalids222 You will need a struture of variables controlling all those calculations. Will that progression (1,2,3,...) be fixed or should it be inserted as input parameters?

[khalids222]

@l-andorrà said in Question about the value of open positions and the number of lots:

You will need a struture of variables controlling all those calculations. Will that progression (1,2,3,...) be fixed or should it be inserted as input parameters?

should it be inserted as input parameters?
All these variables are ready and working fine but my problem is, how do I combine the old with the new only

[khalids222]

@l-andorrà
https://fxdreema.com/shared/TdKbkIEsb
This is a perception of the project, but the problem is to combine the old commands with the new

[l'andorrà]

@khalids222 Yes, I recommend that. Is it not an 'elegant' way to do it, but it is effective. On the other hand, you can create a rigid structure of condition blocks determining your progression. Mostle like in this example I created some time ago based on the 'oscar's grind' strategy. I hope it helps:

https://fxdreema.com/shared/ycClV5ffd