fxDreema

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Back to the main page
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Search

    Share different strategies

    Questions & Answers
    2
    5
    1317
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      emilio last edited by

      I´m interested in share my strategies in order to made them better with things like reduce drawdawn, use of martingale -paroli /other options ....other ideas .... ect I believe this forum is a perfect starting point with experimented programmers/traders.
      If we could share our own background maybe will be more profitable for all us.

      If only "I have this problem please solve it" my feeling is that we are wasting 70% of this forum power.

      Any idea to run ???

      Thank you all in advance.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • U
        uchiha last edited by

        Nice suggestion...

        How do you evaluate a winning strategy?

        A recent method I discovered, is to check your win/loss percentage [not profit/loss amounts] for a given number of trades (I choose 20), now, if its above 50%, you have an edge, so there is no need to 'improve' the strategy. If the strategy still incurs a loss (in money) then your money management needs to be changed to tip the balance (without changing the strategy).

        So rather than improve a winning system, an EA developer can simply calculate the systems edge on a per 20 trades( or any preferred number) basis, and once the results fall below 50% the EA stops and sends the owner an alert. Then you can consider improving or reconfiguring your EA.

        My two cents 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • E
          emilio last edited by

          The only way to evaluate the strategy till now was to run a background since the oldest date that the broker database lets. Or since 1/1/2015.
          As an example this print screen, I would like to reduce D.D. but I consider it is the price to pay for a constant result stability.

          What is the software used to upload printscreens ???? Attached file .ex4 and result of it since 1/1/2015, with the example.

          Is it possible to get you feedback for it ???

          Tks.

          ......
          DRAWDOWN eurostock.ex4
          result.jpg

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • U
            uchiha last edited by

            From what I see, you have a very good EA, the draw-down is reasonable. There's simply no need to tamper with it.
            Personally I do not rely on back-tests, it isn't a true reflection of an EA's potential (my opinion).
            If I were you, I would forward test it for a given time or number of trades and then check the results again.

            Again I will say, if it's not broken (it looks very good) - don't try to 'fix' it. Over optimizing might end-up spoiling a good EA.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              emilio last edited by

              Thank you very much, I´ll do as you suggest too.

              To run the EA I forget to attach a custom indicator needed , now it is attached.

              I hope you can reproduce now the same theoretical back test results as me, starting on 1/1/2015 from eurostock index.

              Emilio

              ......
              FxMaOscillator_v1.03.ex4

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 1 / 1
              • First post
                Last post

              Online Users

              F
              G
              O
              Z
              M
              W
              N
              G
              H
              S
              E

              23
              Online

              146.7k
              Users

              22.4k
              Topics

              122.6k
              Posts

              Powered by NodeBB Forums | Contributors