Can anyone see anything wrong with this sequence?

[Frewster]

https://fxdreema.com/shared/Z5bgRKiQd

I will have 3 groups of trades running and this algo should only apply to group 2.

Potentially there will be 4 trades running in group 2 at any one time but more than likely it will be 3 trades.

thanks in advance.

[l'andorrà]

@frewster

1. Blocks 1239, 1208 and 2061 are unnecessary. Just remove them.
2. Block 1191 is recommended to select >= instead of only ==. Otherwise the condition can be missed if a gap happens and profit is higher.
3. Blocks 1330, 1230, and 2062 are unnecessary. Just remove them.

[Frewster]

@l-andorrà

excellent thank you very much!

If I change the == to >= in the first algo will that not keep trying to put the trailing stop back to break even. Negating the condition I would like to apply if profit is above 300?

[l'andorrà]

@frewster Interesting question. I would say no, but honestly never tried it. AFAIK the break even block moves the stop just once, but what you say is logic. Just try it and let me know.