@l-andorrà said in I want to combine the HIGH of the candle with the previous candles:
What do exacly mean by 'combine'. They are price levels. Maybe you mean 'substituting'?
I mean to add the price to the current candle as follows:
high1+ high2 +high3
Every hour the current candle is added
@l-andorrà said in Close positions at the end of the candle:
In that case the first image's logic is wrong. You need an open trade to remove a pending order. That means that if there is no open trade right now, no pending order will be removed.
Can you explain more what is correct, I see the request is open and has not been closed yet
@l-andorrà said in Close positions at the end of the candle:
Your first image is linking an open trade (searched for that 'for each trade') to delete a pending order. Are you sure about that logic? That means those oending orders will never be deleted unless there is an open trade right now.
If I don’t know if the logic is correct or not? But I expect it to be true.
Let me explain it in a simple way, while the candle is at the end of the hour, in the last half a minute from the end of the open candle.
I want the expert to delete the old command, because at the beginning of the new candle another command will be opened.
This is first.
In the second picture: At the end of the hourly candle, there will be a check on profits if one dollar closes the BUY OR SELL
In this example I want at the end of the candle per hour.
Specifically in the last minute of the end of the candle, check for profits as well as pending orders
. If there is profit, if one dollar closes the profit, it will delete orders
I have developed a method and I want to know whether it is correct where when I test it on the test it does not appear to me
@l-andorrà said in WHY ONE PER BAR NOT WORKING:
Remove both 'once per bar' blocks from ots current position and put just one on top of blocks 93 and 97.
I don't want her to work only once, I want her to work every time an intersection occurs.
In this example, when working on a zero candle, when opening a buy or sell.
And the return of the price again does not open a counter deal.
Although the opposite candle is completely independent? Why ? And how to make it work?
https://fxdreema.com/shared/OHIN3c9nd
On a different subject than usual
In light of this pandemic, I hope that everyone will be fine, and I hope that this epidemic will be removed from the world.
There are people who have benefited from them, and they have clear fingerprints. We hope they are fine.
TRADER.PHILIPPS Creative .ROAR ,MIRO .LANDORRA ,
Many others, the forum with them is a wonderful real school
I hope that everyone is okay
@khalids222 How do I set a method after buying or selling to know the current price every second. OR NOW ?
So that if there is an order to buy and the price down opens a direct sale. vice versa
@seb-0 said in How to avoid zero candle errors؟:
As there is a big number of ticks in a bit of time, comparing the price every tick to a referred price(buy/sell price) just set is, in many situations, gonna open a large number of opposite positions. One tick it will be above, the other below... The easiest way (probably the best), to avoid "wrong" trades, is to set candle 1.
What if I increased 15 points to the zero candle to give more confirmation of the price or vice versa, there would be 15 points negative
In this picture several wrong orders caused by using the zero candle, I want to help in a specific way to avoid these errors by:
After buying or selling, the price is compared to buying and selling at every moment.
In the event of a difference, a valid order will be opened.
Waiting for your participation and help in this? I want your opinion in the best way
In this project, the moving average junction is up and down. There will be buy and sell.
And when there is only one deal, whether buying or selling as block 21- 26
A second deal must be opened to increase , but that does not happen. Why?
Is there an error in logic?
In the event of several buying and selling deals, one of which is profitable and the second is a loss, and the trend is an upside example, the expert will close the profitable selling positions. vice versa as a block 10 & 15
And also it does not work .
Finally when closing deals, deals are not opened directly on the second candle, there is a long delay, I don’t know why. Although the condition was met
@l-andorrà LOOK TO C1 CHANGEDFROM C2 TO C1 AGAIN
When setting the variables you notice that they change every time in an unknown way?
@seb-0 said in There are software errors on the site, I think.:
I never noticed that error. Until few months ago, when you changed the name of a variable which was already used in a block, you had to re-select the variable(with new name) in that block. But it has been fixed. If it persists you can report it in the "bug reports" section.
Now the variable has been changed more than once.
See this picture changed again
There are software errors on the site, I think.
I noticed when variable values were put into the FORMULA
And clicking on update and close the equation, and reopening it again I find the values changed again, I photographed it and found it different from what I set.
And also placed TRACE I found the values changed completely
Do I have this problem on my own or not?
In this image all values changed when saving and reopening, and sometimes it returns as it was, there is something wrong
@l-andorrà THANK YOU VERY MUCH BUT WAHT IS the best SLiPPAGE ? What is the best number for slippage?
@l-andorrà
The problem is not in the blocks, but I expect there is a different problem?
Generally when opening a deal it takes a long time, to open another deal.
Or change the time period.
So in general, what are the problems that could do that?
When an EA opens and closes a deal when it is installed, it does not open a second deal except after a long time despite the BUY and SELL conditions being met? Why
