Posts made by l'andorrà

@xyon126 Exactly, you will need a specific structure to do that. The only way to create a hard TP is calculating the proce value first and then use the pink blocks to put it on the chart.

@biokaja said in Why do you use SL when it is not switched on?:

shared/Vp6YaunEd

There is no initial SL specified when opeining a trade. Then you select the trailing stop block. I'm not completely sure what you need exactly.

@wadz91 I replied to your thread with this same question.

@wadz91 Your logic is correct. This means the reason for so few trades must be in the conditions required to open a new one. Maybe they are too restrictive.

@piotras10000 If they are not necessary, simply remove them. You will still see the results I see your formula block is below the 'comment' block. You should connect it above instead. Otherwise you will never see the updated value of the DD.

@walter-0 Can you please share the link to the project?

@ontradingx It is certainyly weird. I hope the admin can find the issue.

@vish You can calculate the new TP into a variable and then use this:

@mr-lenny Here you have a fully functional martingale EA with fxDreema:

https://fxdreema.com/shared/6o0uTdg3e

However, I do not recommend to use this strategy for any serious trading. Any martingale will destru your account sooner than later.

@piotras10000 Blocks 33 and 35 are not providing any value for those variables. What values are supposed to be there?

@wadz91 Please focus on one thread only. You are still using two threads for the same question.

@wadz91 Can you please share the link instead? That will make it easier to review.

@jstap Ok. Thanks.

@jstap Ok. So it should say If start_buy_count=false. Right?

@william-1 Are all combinations possible or just some of them? There is a simple way to do it via arrays, but then you will need custom code. There are no blocks in fxDreema doing that, I'm afraid.

@ontradingx I remember the admin saying long ago this is an old relict of repvious versions of fxDreema. The 'once per bar' option there is not relevant now as there is a block doing exactly that, so you can use the 'continuous' option by default and then use the 'once per bar' block when necessary.

@jstap Are you sure block 4 is correct? I guess not.

@mr-lenny Man, don't get me wrong but you are requiring something to expensive to aks for it for free here! Trust me, you cannot understand the logic just by backtesting it only.

@cuyano Technically it is possible, but additional info would be appreciated. What criteria are supposed for the EA to determine those TP and SL distances. And what about lot size. Depending on those criteria the complexity of the project can increase dramatically.

@piotras10000 I recommnd to use the 'Comment' block on a completely separated tree that should be executed the last on the 'on tick' time. If you use it like that now you will never get the updated value of DD.

On the other hand I see you didn't specify any modification for all variables on blocks 33 and 35. Did you missed them?