Posts made by l'andorrà

@setsuna said in Pending doenst work. I like some feedback!!:

@l-andorrà Im a little confuse. the administrator said and i quote: When you see the word "Trade", it means running order. While pending orders are these Stop or Limit orders who are waiting to be triggered and become "trades" . So if i use for each trade that means it is trading right?

'For each trade' is a block looking for all open trades right now, not pending orders. Trailing stop is only operative on open trades. This is why you need it. If you launch several pending orders, none of them will be an open oders until the price reaches the entry level. Then 'For each trade' will identify it and will apply the trailing stop rules on it.

Try more backtesting on other brokers and let us know.

No. A script will be executed just once, at the exact moment you put it on the chart. Then it will never work again. That means the trailing stop will be inoperative. If you need a real trailing stop, you need an EA.

Do you mean launching a buy order on open price of candle 0 at the high price of candle 1 if it is higher, maybe?

If you revisit fxDreema's homepage you will see this:

You are welcome

De acuerdo. Entonces, si lo entiendo correctamente, tu ves en el gráfico una linea que señala un precio. Lo que quieres "tomar" el valor de esa linea para usarlo en tus órdenes de lanzamiento. ¿Es así?

¿Podrías incluir una captura de pantalla de los buffers del indicador, por favor? A lo mejor por ahí puedo ver algo.

I'm not sure what you mean by proce going up for 1%. If price is 1.2000 now then you need a pending order at (1.2000 x 0.01) = 1.2120. Is that correct? But when do you need it to be launched. At the moment price reaches 1.2000 or when you say otherwise?

Are you asking the same you asked here?

https://fxdreema.com/forum/topic/7413/buy-sell-every-candle-multipul-trades

I don't recommed to use the trailing block that way. Your logic means that all pending orders depend on that moving stop. Is that whatyou really want. I strongly recommend you to move it out of that thread and create a new one:

First block: For each trade.
Second block: Trailing stop.

On the other hand, the admin is right. What are you looking for? Buy/sell orders right now or pending orders for the near future?

Why don't you share your project? Maybe we can help you.

Problem solved finally! The admin found that apostrophes on the profile page mess things up. Now I finally recovered all functionalities again!

Please excuse me but I'm afraid I don't understand exactly what you want. Could you please add some picture?

Do you mean you project or my example? My example works as intended.

1. What I men is that you should do this:

2. Another question. If I understand correctly, there can be just one buy and/or one sell at the same time. Right? Never two or more buys/sells altogether. Correct?

Honestly I would need some time to think and search about it. Meanwhile, maybe roar and mireo can offer us some help?

A few points to begin with.

1. Never put any trailing block that way. They are efficient only when separated from your 'launching' thread of blocks.

2. What do you exactly mean by 'Once per trade'? Haw can you require the block passes when there is no trade right now?

3. Could ypu please share your project (not a screenshot only)? More issues could be found.

What do you mean by multiple? Many at the same entry price or at different entry levels?

Easy. Try this:

https://fxdreema.com/shared/yeaUHJ4Rb

But why is there a narrow green strip that is inexistent in red?

Never tried to move from MQ5 to MQ4. Copying is not effective. There are some common blocks that are very different. I do not recommend you to copy all of them.