Posts made by fabiobioware

@l-andorrà https://fxdreema.com/shared/OyxArLenb
Hello friend, see the project as an example that I created, it is very simple and this rule does not work.
I configured to open a purchase if the RSI is below 30 and a sale if the RSI is above 70.

Then I did not define TP and SL and configured other blocks to check if the sum of profit + swap + commission is greater than 2 $ that all trades are closed immediately.
So the EA should only close all trades when this profit is achieved, it works until a certain moment, but suddenly it just stops working and starts closing trades in the negative with losses, which was not supposed to happen because the rule is close "only if the sum of all orders + swap + commission was positive at 2 $.

Hello friends I want to create a rule for my EA to check if the sum of the value of all orders including commission and Swap rates are positive above 2 $ it immediately closes all orders that are open and give me a profit of 2 $
Can you please check if this is right the way I did it.
I put it on the ontick tab because I realized that the ontrade tab doesn't work.
But even in the ontick tab the way I did it, I realized that in some moments of backtesting he doesn't always close the orders in the positive, it's as if he hadn't been calculating correctly at some point.
I was wondering if anyone has any example of how I could do this using other blocks to have proof that it really is working or not, I wanted to save the sum of all commission, swap and profit values in separate variables and add them up to find out if it really is a problem in this block calculation.

https://fxdreema.com/shared/Or6r7GWAb

@bk7 is using the same indicator that I posted or is it a private indicator? can you just share this part of the project with me along with this indicator?

@bk7 can you create a simple project on fxdreema and share it with me showing how you would make a buy and sell entry with this indicator?

@bk7 you can show me one example using fxdreema project?

@bk7 I did not understand what you meant, so it is not possible to make fxdreema make purchase or sale entries with this indicator?

use the buffers of this indicator, can you help me?

I made the attempt to use the buffers of the arrows of this indicator but it is not working.
Anyone with knowledge of indicators here to help?0_1613843375609_macd_divergence.mq5

The idea is to have a buffer for the red arrow and one for the green arrow. So I can create a buy or sell rule using these arrows.
I believe it is something missing from the code.

@l-andorrà it's true my friend, i already realized that many people had a headache with this subject, thanks for the information.

Hello friends, could someone help me find divergence in a different way?
I know that there is a "MACD" divergence block and even a topic that the target teaches how to use.
But my question goes a little further ... come on:

In the image I found with the help of the RSI and the Zig Zag a divergence, while the RSI registered that fund 1 was lower than fund 2 in the graph it was registered that fund 1 was higher than fund 2, so in this case I think there was a difference.

What I would like to do is to know when this happens but in the following way:

1. Create a rule to always check the last 2 funds on the currency chart.
2. Insert 2 vertical lines marking the respective candles that correspond to these 2 located funds.
3. Take advantage of these lines to then locate on the RSI (or any other indicator, it may be the macd) 2 funds in the same range of candles.
4. Identify if the "divergence between them occurred in this interval.
5. If it happened then to place a warning, perhaps a mark indicating that it happened to be a sign of possible entry.

@l-andorrà said in Candle Wick top crosses line Resistance condiction?:

Can you please confirm how those support/resistance lines are created? Manually or via the EA itself?

through the EA itself.

@l-andorrà Can you give me an example of how to do this?
I drew the lines because I don't know how to do this.

Candle wick, crossing objects on the chart.

Hello my friends, considering the horrible drawing I made below:

I would like to create a rule to take advantage of the top wick on top of the candle and authorize entry into a supposed sale if:
The candle wick crosses the resistance line.

So I could create this rule as I did in the project below:
https://fxdreema.com/shared/n2XfhYbB

Project --> https://fxdreema.com/shared/qvfzZLPOb

Hello friends, can you help me understand how to use the block "Trailing money loss (group of trades)" correctly?

I do not know if it serves what I need, my EA opens several orders but I just want to do a trailling to go ensuring the maximum profit that I can in the first order.

My initial target is 20 $ and my idea is that when the first order reaches 20 $ the Stop is moved guaranteeing me 15 $, and for every 5 $ of gain my stop should go guaranteeing every 5 $, that is.
Activate the Trailling stop when the price reaches $ 20 profit.
Move my stoploss to 15 $. If the price reaches 25 $ profit then move to 20 $ my stop loss and so on.

@l-andorrà yes, i am aware, at least 2 open negotiations are necessary for this block to pass to the others.

@l-andorrà It requires at least 2 open trades because I am working at an average price.
I do not apply an average price on the first order, the first order I apply an estimated gain value, for example 2 $, when my first order reaches 2 $ profit already discounting swap and commission it closes automatically.

@fabiobioware @miro1360 what's your opinion? can you help me?

@l-andorrà hello my friend.

Hello my friend, can you help me understand why my EA is not moving the Stop Loss of all orders correctly along with the line?

Explaining, I created a rule that always checks if the profit is greater than $ 2.00, if there is only one order open, then he must close the profit on this first order and end the trade.
If there is more than one open order, say for example 4 open orders then he must do the following:

1. Check if the sum of the profit from all orders + swap + commission is greater than $ 2.00
2. If the previous condition is being met, then he must verify that the previous "or minimum candle" fund is greater than the sum of the profit of all orders + swap + commission of $ 2.00
3. If so, he must plot a horizontal line that I name as stoplossbuy.
4. Finally, he must move the Stoploss of all open orders together to this line.

What happens is that sometimes the line moves, but the stop loss does not move together exactly where the line is.
I want the Stop Loss to always be with the line, and that the StopLoss is only placed on the line if the conditions are in full profit, the idea is that the stoploss is always at the bottom of the previous candle.

My project test --> https://fxdreema.com/shared/WpZUQlZqb

@l-andorrà I consult them so much that they must be upset with me.
I will keep trying for a while by myself so as not to take up their time.
Thank you very much my friend for the help you have been giving me.

@l-andorrà hello friend, Doing it this way, I'm saying "Does the total profit including Swap and commissions have to be greater than $ 100"?

Hello friends, I would like to know how to calculate and include the Swap so as not to generate a loss in my negotiations.

I've been trading a pair, but it took several days to close the trade and generated this Swap balance of - $ 48.41
My profit from this order was 673.83 $ but only with the Swap of all other orders (My EA opens several orders) I ended up not receiving the profit I would like in the total amount.