Posts made by jstap

They are not normally needed, but sometimes they are so, two blocks connected to "and", both need to be true for the block to pass, two blocks connected to "or", only one needs to be true for the block to pass (both these blocks work with more than 2 connected blocks). Generally, all blocks are connected with an and principle, if a block passes, check the next, if this passes check the next. if 2 blocks are connected to the same orange dot, then 1, 2, 1 & 2, or 0 can pass giving you the or principle.

You can probably create on here with a mobile, but it will create a PC bot, these EAs can be viewed on mobile but they run on a computer

Effectively you have 3 or 4 trees that would be better separated, because generally a block connected to one above, relies on that blocks action to do something, disconnect things, test 1 section at a time, and then you will know what tree is causing trouble

You are welcome

No mate because I don't know

Admin replied to something about this the other day, can't remember the link, or whether this will help but it had to do with the connection from Thailand

Add a shared link, might see the problem

Not sure, add a shared link, might see the problem

Close can and most likely should be in a separate tree from the buy/sell tree

Not easily, but you could use pink blocks and modify them all so you have the standard lines altogether.

You will have to add a shared link to look at, might see what's wrong

Tings normally works on all for me, add a shared link to look at, maybe the problem can be seen.

No, this block won't draw a line, you would have to use it non-visually

.......

If close is under an if trade it can't work if there is a trade, if under buy/sell of the same type it will close what has just been placed. So in summary under conditions that won't interfere with what has been placed, until it should.

Only if connected

.....Yes