Posts made by jstap

So you prtobibly need a string variable that is filled before sending, but I need more information from you so I know what you want

Very good but where is your information on what you are trying to do?

Need more information on what you mean

TimeToString(1570951168,TIME_DATE|TIME_MINUTES) ...will give you that value as a string

No, I use true & false but this does == 0 & 1

You are welcome

@saeedi67ab Generate a new question, don't hijack others. And give more information about how and what you have collected

It will be something like this:

Contact them but, if crypto it will take considerably longer to activate

Maybe your code, I use this regularly, and it works for me, try this: (_1StoOverBought==1 && _1RSI_OverBought==0)
providing you have bool variables created with those names

@lazyfxceo That code will not work in FX without modification, and it is all in FX meaning minimal code is be needed

Change what I've said, then report back if somethings not working, and I'll say what needs changing

Ok but does this trade open on your MT5? If so select All in all blocks

How are the trades placed?

in account you can get the broker name, and check if this matches what you specify, otherwise terminate

This will in backtest, add the delay block 1000=1 second you can use this or another tactic to make the EA wait

on your platform live or backtest, right click, change settings to preferred, add all required indicators, right click and save template

You shouldn't need 13 because it's in the main tree

Generally, I find that to have things work quicker (as in when a tick arrives, and this is when volatility/liquidity comes into it, as a tick is a price change) have the first block in the relevant tree the lowest number and don't allow blocks that consume system recourses to activate until the relevant command has acted. When completing an EA on FX check the flow of blocks is non-restrictive. And on timer (& possibly on chart) works regardless of ticks just at the set time, but not for backtest

I an not sure if this will get the relevent value to multiply from, use the same principles and put the values into a comment, then you can visibly check what's happening