This will do it: https://fxdreema.com/shared/otPzzpEXd
Change the relevant picture, which has to be the right size to work, and change where you want it placed.
This will do it: https://fxdreema.com/shared/otPzzpEXd
Change the relevant picture, which has to be the right size to work, and change where you want it placed.
Use the price level and when the price goes beyond delete the object by name.
I did this a long time ago, and although you cannot change the name of the fib level, what you can do is use formulas to save the fib level into a variable, draw a trend line in this level, and then draw text on the level.
To put this simply, if true it will follow the orange dot, if false the yellow. the numbers only come into effect in unconnected trees.
@l-andorrà I am not sure that's correct, the visual is drawn from the price/time of each object? @GOKACHIT There is a block called check distance, use this to check if the required distance is within range, you may need to save the price of the cross in a variable.
If you know what section and blocks are causing the problem, ask people for help on that problem. Even set it up on a small test project, then people can see the problem and try to help.
@DragonZueloTrends Greetings, I replied to your English written words, many do speak Spanish, and many countries speak it too, but FX is predominantly English, if you want a Spanish response, write your question in Spanish.
@DragonZueloTrends I think that this post comes from people requesting that the admin gives them a discount. Which from a business POV makes no sense. People on this forum will help for free, a limited few will try to make money from it, but people who know the answers to help have often put in many hours of their time to learn. And then there are the people who ask for something to be done but haven't even bothered to learn the basics. If people just ask for one problem at a time, they will normally get an answer (sometimes they may have to wait). It is tedious when you keep seeing the same question that you have answered many times before.
If you are still doing this, use miro1360 ZZ code to get the ZZ IDs, then compare something like high1 vs high2 and use the ZZ candle IDs to compare the standard MACD. If one is higher and the other lower, you have the divergence.
When it comes to creating EAs, creating a little bit, then testing, then adding, then testing is the best way. This way you are never far from the problem, and you know what blocks contain the issue.
There is a block to do this, but stop can move back on new trades, for each trade will make all trade stops catch up with each other
Can you not just take current balance - starting balance?
To start get all the relevant values from 1 asset, then add them together. Then do the same on asset 2, then you can compare the results. This is what I mean by two many blocks, set up test projects, then when working you can add into your main project.
You have far to many blocks to analyse, if you mean which points to use, I do not know, and determining which ones to use is difficult.
This is true, but if you drag the cross-hair, the points value that is displayed is what you add as pips. The choice is yours but you either have to change the $ value or the point value, I find it easier to change the pips.
You can do this, but why? Depending on your lot, pips = $, only they adjust to the value of the used lots.