Best posts made by TipsyWisdom

@alphaomega it all depends on your thought process I reckon. from a user standpoint of a non-tradition coder like me, I absolutely understand what hes talking about what the trades in and out for each entry and exit. Because I trade manually though is why I understand it. Also ,he's only speaking on that specific portion. "

From our user perspective, and depending on what level of detail in your EA development you use (you could use what he's talking about) but his level of coding on the backend is most surely what he is talking about when he originally had to sort through it especially.

and it also depend on how you will use metatrader. MT5 is beyond superior than MT4 in regards to backtesting, viewing, optimizing. And you also have access to a few more details things in the blocks that you dont have in MT4.

this one?

https://fxdreema.com/demo/mt4-price-vs-indicator

@BHovens @l-andorrà

i wont take your money, but you can message me the idea and we can start from there. I also wont pursue you for more money if it doesnt work as intended even after your instructions.

ah right, you cant leave check marks, variables, and or constants in a block if you want to stop using it. It stays kinda "ghosted" in the code, so while you cant physically see it, its there still and is expecting to be interacted with...but can't be.

I'm glad I could assist with the moral decision...unfortunately it is in MT5 and I am unable to test for results.

So looking through I'm asking myself a few things;

1. Why in the first 2 condition blocks on each side did you put symbol as "USDollar"? I would remove them, normally you can only place the EA on 1 pair at a time so why specify that one just 1 or 2 of the whole blocks in the chain?
2. At the end of running a test do your buys and sells make the same profit with the same draw down or does the buy column do better than sell?
3. I understand what you are saying about perfect experts and indicators...some people say that they're a waste of time as they are always telling you what you already know.
4. The total concept of the strategy...I don't know if it could work well. Its almost as if you are fighting making a decision but I am hopeful it will work for you

@vighnesh said in Hey please help me out i want to build and EA Based on MACD indicator.Buy when it turns green, Sell when it turns red. close trade if it's -10pips:

bruh, did you snap this picture with the same camera people claim to have spotted the lochness monster?

I like where that strategy is going. Zigzag, draw lines. trade intersections...."Highline" "Lowline" NICE! Those are exactly the variable names I used for a similar project. hah

usually the highest accurate robots are highly based on time. Keeping out of the least probable trades and only entering high probably moves, during specific times of the day, week, and year.

But you could, yes...very difficult because it is a robot. Robots follow all rules so if there is no user input you must have thought of every possible scenario to be able to anticipate.

@roar still helping a brother out, again, years later.

@alphaomega said in FXdreema error or mine?:

@tipsywisdom Thx for taking the time to check out my error... I made sure that the Horizontal line is considered in the condition.. I have not worked on it again because I found another error in my expert and is trying to sort that out for the moment.
I have search many threads already looking at examples to fulfill my strategy and I could,ve stumbled upon yours.. not sure. Could you give me the name of your thread with the trend line variables?..... but my biggest inspiration of using trend lines is miro1360 and roar. I especially want to use roar exploratory trend lines. There is so much information in these vaults of Fxdreema. Wish I had more time to get at least one expert perfect.
Thank you once again

you still have me on Discord? I dont remember what user name you are there. I have so many projects, some that dont even exist on my dreema list anymore.

@ambrogio

ohhhh ok, im mistaken on how that password is implemented then. I will create an EA with it and see how it works!

this is good stuff gents, probably the fineer details of ea verification that really matter and no effort or thought goes into it

@breeeeen said in Margin Level (in %) return infinite is bugged:

Hi there,

When the Margin Level (in %) Account condition is set to return infinite, nothing trades.

An easy workaround is to use the "No positions" block and ignore this check if there are no positions, but it would be good if the infinite number is fixed. Maybe set it to 99999 as an alternative?

(I tested assigning a constant with 99999 to "when no trades" and it works perfectly.)

Thanks for that find.

Lots of things like that can be worked around, but always good to let people know the workaround. Thanks again!

dang, yall are on a whole different level above me. I wouldn't know where to begin with coding like that. I'll figure it out if I ever feel like I need to. haha

Ive always used chrome and dont seem to have any issues from the browser that im aware of!

@roar agreed I got it to work with candle highs and lows, but fractals was the goal. Thank you again!

the logic doesnt make sense, if you want it at the same level then its not pending at it will open 2 trades at the same time. "

If this is the case, then just put both blocks side by side connected down from the final condition telling you to enter the trade.

@jstap lol

true true...but a business partner shouldn't be any different in that regard!

@roar nice work as always man. I wish I knew what all of it meant! lol