@l-andorrĂ said in Chart objects not being deleted on MT5 deinit:
@general-melchett Move the 'partial' word to the 'Name contains' box instead.
I always use it in both to be safe.
@l-andorrĂ said in Chart objects not being deleted on MT5 deinit:
@general-melchett Move the 'partial' word to the 'Name contains' box instead.
I always use it in both to be safe.
@kallamamran said in Finally , Integration of News Filter
[ MT4 Only ]:
@ambrogio Hello,
I have managed to open the MQ4 in MetaEditor and compiled it with the manually created Boolean trade-variable, but I do get a warning compiling the script.
I don't know if I need to do something about this or what to do. Can you please advice?!
Also what's meant by "You will have to copy that 2 block from Oninit() and other 2 also from Deinint()". Where are these supposeed to be copied?!
Best regards // Kallamamran
More than likely it is just the way that the boolean block is being utilized but if it works, disregard the error.
It can be done with the blocks that are already in Dreema, just a matter of configuration.
I've used 2 asset classes to generate signals to tell me when to trade a 3rd.
I think there is some miscommunication.
I think Biztet is trying to get multiple time frames to display after an EA conducts a backtest, or perhaps a way to display multiple frames of time for the single EA that operates on many frames of time?
Otherwise the solution is simple.
You have EA time frame. Within that frame of time you could have conditions you seek on a daily while using the M1 to seek entries. This is as simple as connecting the daily condition block down to the M1 entry condition block. Now you are operating the EA on 2 frames of time. However neither of those frames of times are what you perceive the EA on. That is a 3rd angle that you will see the EA operate at. The time frame that you manually choose in the metatrader software.
Now when I say you should be in full control of your EA, if you are not specifying a way to control time for every block that asks for time input, then your entire EA will be subject to problems because then that unspecified frame of time will automatically be set to "current" or whatever the perceived view of the EA is set to. I.e. the manually set time before you start a backtest.
I dont know how to break apart and use the portions of time code that I would need to subtract 2 time frames to generate a result.
@ontradingx sorry, no resolution currently other than to use an external indicator and there are some available.
Looking for a few individuals that might be interested in assisting me with this idea...
We have a way to measure ticks, and ticks per second with dreema. Anyone think they may be able to transform the data that an EA receives and then create an output in the form of another chart, a tickchart to be specific?
I.e. If we plot, chart, graph the # of ticks that happen every second...what would that look like? We'd have our own tick chart is what it would be. I would imagine its in place of the chart in total. Make the candles black to match the background, get rid of the grid with table properties and then viola...now we have a blank space to draw ticks.
Anyone interested in achieving something like that?
yikes...nothing came to me other than using an indicator someone else has already built that allows you to change the times...
trying to find a physical solution now, not just conceptually...I think this is going to be a MQL5 custom thing...we'll see.
@ontradingx said in Order opening based on remaining time:
thank you for asking that, I was trying to think of a solution for that weeks ago. You made me think of it in 2.2 seconds 
I would read hours separate from minutes separate from seconds and just constantly check their values and then when one of the 3 is below the threshold...
@advanceriskway said in Is it possible to use betting: custom with base volume in money not lots ?:
@l-andorrĂ I think it out. Calculate the lot size of the fixed amount, then put it in the base volume. That's it.
There is an option to select size by equity and balance....and many other options of money management in the buy and sell blocks.
@biztet said in Timeframe Conditions Problem:
Alright, thanks.
You ought to be in total control of your EA's and time. Meaning, if you manually change the settings on your EA tester screen and not the time frames of your EA settings, it should trade exactly the same because you are only selecting a viewing time frame is how you should look at that.
@bhadzlagayan said in Call a function for calculating next higher timeframe ** SOLVED **:
will this work in reverse? like I need the next lower timeframe?
The code would need to be changed, but yes, it could.
disregard, i see its a dashboard style.
Id make it do the setup automatically first and troubleshoot from there. conceptually prove it in backtest first.
the first block is set to manual trades only...
I sometimes have server issues, but I have dealt with them for over a year now so I an used to it.
Sometimes when you do something you must wait impatiently. Sometimes if you click to move or drop a block for instance and it gives an error, just refresh and resume and its usually fine for me. Other times it just requires waiting afew seconds, click on the background and the save file thing will pop up.
Those are my common issues and fixes.
@pan4pips said in Array on dynamic data.:
@pan4pips Is FXD that insufficient that it's not possible?
if you can code then you can draw a custom block, you can do anything you want in dreema that way!
Yea, to have For Each Position and For Each Closed, in the same tree will cause conflict.
@jstap said in Feature Request:
@ontradingx He is talking about the highest or lowest open or close price:
exactly, iHighest and iLowest, without having to do the code. Just another button to drag and drop.