@FX-drema Hi, I need information about fxDreema and / or MT4 about their capacity or operability, let me explain, I have made a Panel with many buttons and functions and I find that these buttons (the code + blocks) verify them before incorporating them to the Panel separately and they worked perfectly for me but on the other hand, in the Panel they do not execute anything; Is it possible that MT4 or fxDreema have limitations and do not allow more than a number of functions?
Thanks a lot
Hi. I have a question. It is possible to create a drop-down menu in an EA and make the submenu have other EA,s.
With the immense help of @miro1360 I managed to have an operations panel from which I think I can get the drop down menu but it would not help me if it is not possible to call and run Scripts or EA, s. from this EA. The Script and EA that will go in the menu are made with fxDreema.
Thank you very much in advance.
@l-andorrà said in Doubt with SELL and BUY:
The easiest way to try both options is just by creating a small testing bot with variables in then choose different % numbers. I prefer to use '% of Balance --> lots'. The number you should use then is the exact percentage you are thinking of: 50 means 50% of your current balance.
So if I understand correctly, if I want the Money Management to be 0.5% of the real Balance or the real Equity in the box, I must put 0.5, is that so? naturally regardless of the Lottery that turns out that is another matter.
@l-andorrà If I understood your advice correctly, I have only varied blocks 57, 58 and 59 as I think you mentioned, the rest is the same (I have only renumbered the blocks)
@l-andorrà Yes! I want to have the same EA in several windows of the same PAR but with different temporalities, in this way different operations will be opened with different temporalities and each one with a different configuration, it is as if I had 5 or 6 EAs with the same strategy but with values of The MAs are different and adapted to their time map since with different configurations the results are similar but with the same MA configuration in different temporalities, the EA is only valid in one temporality.
@jose-labay said in Ichimoko Cloud o Ihimoku Kumo, cómo quieras llamarlo, as you want to say:
@xyon126
Un placer compartir experiencias contigo, y si se da la ocasión por mi parte no hay problema en comentar las cosas que vemos que funcionan medianamente bien y ver como mejorarlas.
Un saludo
Lo mismo digo, puedo compartir lo que quieras.
Por cierto, conoces la metodologia y web de Joaquin Vega?
Si la conoces ¿Que opinas?
@jose-labay Hola José! No se si conoces la Web de Yuri Rabassa, el es el creador de la estrategia del "Cumo Goichi", es una estrategia que funciona a M15, H1 y D1, yo la he probado en M15 y H1 pues no tengo paciencia para D1, los resultados son bastantes buenos pero pasarla a EA no he podido por limitaciones del fxDreema con el Ichimoku, ya que una vez creada no daba resultado alguno por culpa del Kijun-sen a 26 o el Senkou Span B a -52, uno de los problemas del fxDreema es que no te permite o reconoce o asi me han informado utilizar valores negativos en los periodos, el indicador propio si lo acepta pero fxDreema a dia de hoy aún no, el otro problema es el retraso del Kijun-sen, este es el que hay que poner el ID de la vela a 26 pero no siempre funciona con lo que al final esta Estrategia tan buena no pude aplicarla o pasarla a EA. Con Ichimoku yo he encontrado varias estrategias incluso me cree una que es una variante de una existente pasada a EA y funciona bastante bien pero el problema es que solo ejecuta unas 100 operaciones al año de las que el 70% son positivas y eso pasado a M15. No se si te sirve de ayuda la información, posiblemente en fxDreema el Ichimoku con programacion MQL puedass obtener resultados muy buenos pero este es un campo que se me escapa.
Aqui te adjunto el backtesting de la EA con Ichimoku con un rango de 11 mese del ultimo año que realice y te he comentado, pensaras que con 11 meses es poco, estadisticamente es asi, pero puedo asegurarte que la probe con 5 años y el resultado no vario mas que un 5% y los primeros años eran para mi poco realistas a la realidad actual ya que el mercado ahora fluctua mas de un 200% respecto hace 3 años y los Brocker institucionales ahora aplican mas que antes los engaños y las laterizaciones que son un crimen para nosotros y para Ichimoku.
Un saludo
@l-andorrà I am interested in knowing how it would be in both, since I understand that it is different from what you comment regardless of whether the resulting lot is 0.001 and the minimum admitted is applied at the end.
@miki, the lot is not the problem, I know that with 1000€ a lot lower than 0.01 can come out, which is the minimum but as the capital increases the resulting lot will be higher, but what I need to know is either 1000€ or 10000€ as the percentage is put in the "Money Management" really, I would not want to put "100" thinking that the result would be 0.1% and the reality is 100% which is all the capital (I know that is impossible) and in Instead of having a Lot of 0.1, I would get a Lot of 10.
@l-andorrà Hello @l-andorrà, is this what you say?
Thanks a lot.
@l-andorrà No, no, the idea is: Suppose we have an EA with a cross condition between 2 MA, an MA of 200 and another of 50 in the M5 temporality; now this EA for the temporality of H1 the MA of 200 should be 50 and the MA 50 should be 5. Now I change in the Temporality Draft and the idea is that with a variable or something that when the seasonality changes in the Draft the EA detect in which temporality it is and apply the corresponding MA value.
In this way with an EA I can in several windows of the same PAR (EURUSD, GBPUSSD, etc.) have the option of having the EA work with MA, with different values according to their temporality, and if I change the temporality in that window automatically the EA will recognize it and vary the MA values.
@cesardefez Naturally it is possible to rename it but I advise you, it is faster, create a Script to rename the Fibo always with the same name and so in the EA you will not have problems, I have done the same but with a Horizontal line.
@miki Thank you very much @miki, but my problem is not the lots, it is to know exactly what amount or number to place to get € 1000 your 0.5%, just that; that is 0.5, 5, 50 or 500.
Good morning! I have a question that worries me from the beginning and I do not know if I am applying it well or not. The question is the following, when I select the option in SELL or BUY in the "Money management" the option "% of Equity => Lots" or "% of Balance =>" if my account is € 1000 and I want a risk of 0.5% in the "How much ..." box, which number should I put 0.5, 5, 50 or 500. Thank you very much.
Hi. I have an EA that opens many trades in a row, my idea is when I have a certain amount of trades open if they already have profits to close, that is, example:
I have 38 operations and of these there are 10 operations that have a profit of more than € 5, when 2 more operations open, as there are 40 I automatically close the operations that have a profit of € 5 or more. I have used this sequence of blocks but it doesn't work for me. Help, thank you very much.
Hello @cesardefez , as they comment you have to identify the Fibo, but here unless you have a Fibo that is always renamed with the same name you have it very difficult since either MQL5 or MQL4 always identifies you, names the Fibo and with a name always different and random.
@l-andorrà Hello @l-andorrà, how is it not a problem, I have used the MQL block because I thought there are no conventional blocks. Thanks a lot.
@didymario7 said in Trailing stop and Take profit:
I know you provided a solution please how can you break it down to a non-programmer so i can understand how to input the correct values.
Thanks once more
I don't understand this question; what do you mean non-programmer?.
Hi, I need help, I want to modify a variable according to the current Time Frame of the Chart, that is, if I am in the Chart in M5 and I have a variable called "Period", I need that variable to become "200", how can I do the operation? I have used this block but it gives me an error, it helps. Thanks a lot.
@didymario7 What you can not do is hang the Trailing Stop from the SELL or BUY block, the trailing Stop that you had created and hung both were the same with what they do exactly the same if you create a Trailing Stop Group 1 and another equal Group 2 would be the same as a Trailing Stop Group #.
The trailing that I have put for you does exactly what you say you want, the blocks are simply as they should be and without unnecessary blocks.
If you look at the fxDreema tutorial in the section on what you should not do, it comes out exactly that, the Trailing Stop block hanging from the SELL or BUY block, as it can give you unexpected results or not execute anything or what is the same as an empty EA .